Sparked in the riots of the sixties and smoldering through the nineties, Pittsburgh endured tremendous social, economic, and cultural commotion. In 1976, a Home Rule form of government was adopted by the people; in the 1980s, the steel mills declined to extinction while the Renaissance campaigns sought to revitalize commerce; the population declined as the hard-working blue-collar workforce was displaced. Swirling from the ashes of social turbulence in the mid-nineties were indicators of seriously strained relations between citizens and their police.
On April 6, 1995, Mr. Jerry Jackson was killed by Pittsburgh police officers. The same year saw the death of Mr. Jonny Gammage at the hands of Baldwin Borough police officers on October 12. The Federal Government was empowered by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (PL 103-322) to take civil action against government authorities that have demonstrated patterns and practices that deprive people of their constitutional rights. In April 1996, the U.S. Department of Justice opened an investigation into the policies and practices of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police.
Several police accountability and citizen protection-related bills passed through the City Council process.
Following the defeat of City Council Bill 1996-397, Council considered legislation to let voters decide through referendum if a civilian review board should be created. A final vote was never taken. The stalemate on Council’s action to place the question before the voters motivated some Council members and hundreds of interested citizens to pursue a petition campaign. The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), Ft. Pitt Lodge No. 1, filed a challenge to the validity of signatures on the petitions in the Court of Common Pleas. On 5/12/1997, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ordered the referendum proceed, which was successful, with 57.3% voting for the creation of a CPRB.
City Council considered two bills to enable the independent citizen review board, Bill 1997-2175, proposed by the administration, and Bill 1997-2177, proposed by City Council. City Council held a public hearing on 7/21/1997 on the proposed legislation.
In a parallel and virtually simultaneous series of events, the U.S. Department of Justice scrutinized the conduct of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police as a result of alleged patterns or practices of civil rights violations. On 4/16/1997, the City of Pittsburgh and the United States voluntarily entered into a consent decree for the purpose of avoiding litigation related to such allegations.
The Board’s first official act was to appoint their Solicitor, Frederick W. Thieman, Esq., and they convened their first official business meeting on 12/01/1997.
Among the many critical tasks facing an emerging organization is the selection of personnel.
“Review Board’s first case involves singer’s daughter”—Pittsburgh Post Gazette, 7/10/1999
Quorum and staggered expiration of board terms proved to be an organizational vulnerability that was exploited during the period of 1999 through 2005.
The tumultuous relationship between the Board and the City’s administration simmered as the Board re-organized its staff and established a calendar of public hearings.