CPRB Board Meeting Minutes

Minutes of CPRB Board Meetings from 2005 to the present day are available on this page or in a quick reference format, listed one per line.

CPRB Action and Case Status Reports presented at CPRB Board Meetings are archived separately on this site, also available in a quick-reference, compressed format.

Check our website calendar or Twitter feed for dates of upcoming meetings.

Minutes of the CPRB Meeting Held on March 22, 2005

A motion to adopt Ms. Pittinger’s Taser Report to Pittsburgh City Council was offered by Mr. Bingler, seconded by Mr. Bankston and approved unanimously; The Board discussed the remaining vacancy and the status of Mr. Freeman’s participation as a member. Mr. Freeman holds the LEP seat designated as a Council nominee. He was appointed in November 2003, and has not attended any meetings nor served on any hearing panels; David A. Harris, Balk Professor of Law and Values at the University of Toledo College of Law, wrote an opinion article in the Post Gazette Sunday edition on March 20, 2005. He was complimentary to the process embraced by citizen oversight of police conduct; The Executive Director requested panel confirmation for the Public Hearing scheduled for April 6, 2005 of Ms. Hinton, Ms. Dalton, and Mr. Bingler; Mr. Billy Jackson has been working on a film-documentary to commemorate the death of Johnny Gammage.

Minutes of the CPRB Meeting Held on February 22, 2005

At 6:30 p.m. Ms. Marsha Hinton, Chair, called the meeting to order. She acknowledged the Members present and noted the absence of the quorum necessary to conduct a regular business meeting; The Board held an informal discussion of the Executive Director’s report. The Board discussed City of Pittsburgh Police Bureau taser policies and the Taser Report submitted by Ms. Pittinger to City Council Members.

Minutes of the CPRB Meeting Held on January 25, 2005

The board briefly discussed scheduling for upcoming public hearings; The Chair expressed concern with case dismissals seemingly due to loss of complainants, incarceration, loss of interest, officer separation, and other variables. Ms. Hinton said she would like staff to streamline the process so as to avoid the circumstances known to discourage citizens from pursuing their complaints at the CPRB; Factors influencing the length of time a case is at the CPRB were discussed.